|
City sends out letters about aging signs
By Zsombor Peter
Staff Writer
|
SIGN VIOLATIONS
Sands Court
Kevin and Lisa Bright
A-Car Mart
Ying Situ Rev. Trust
Bernal's Body Shop
Tim Bernal
Colonial Motel
OM 2000 Inc.
Don Diego's Restaurant
Archie Baca
Goldfield's Indian Jewelry
David Mortensen
Legends
Taira's Inc.
Native Outlet
Dinesh U. and Pushpa D. Patel
Paramount Liquors
Concetto and Helen Digiacomo
Pump-N-Go
Clayton Investments C.O. Etal
Running Bear
Jerry Elkins Inc.
Shalimar Inn
Jim Rashid
Superama Downtown Plaza
California Superama Inc.
Thunderbird Motel
Jim and Itaf Rashid
Thunderbird Supply Co.
Don Cosper
Trade Mart Square
Grant L. Foutz
Virgie's Cafe
Charlie Chavez
Kristy's Coffee Shop
Earleen Simunovich Rev. TR. and John and Marcella
Blue Spruce Motel
George and Saufong Soo Hoo
Mustang Service Station
Giant Industries Arizona Inc.
Pete Leyba All Indian Jewelry
Pete and Tina Leyba
United Development
Sherman's Boots and Jeans Inc.
Zecca Plaza
Galen A. and Jaleh A. Etemad Trustees
El Coronado Motel
Vira Corporation
Old Shell Station
P & R Associates, LLC
Zia Motel
Amar. Corp.
Apache Title
Clayton Investment Co.
Murphy Cash Pawn
Attilio and Lillian Dipaolo
Pinon Placita Plaza
Placita De Sanchez, LLC
Sutherland Furniture
Michael Jr. and Etal Weigl
Old Coors Building
Del Rose Ltd, LLC
Old Dog House
Richards Limited Partnership
|
GALLUP Charlie Chavez, owner of Virgie's Caf on the west end of
town, still gets teased by customers and friends about the colorful multi-story
sign out front with the big yellow arrow pointing to his restaurant, ever
since the city took notice of the paint chipping off it five weeks ago.
It started at the April 26 City Council meeting at which city officials
named Virgie's and 11 other businesses around town as potential candidates
for a new plan to get the owners to fix their dilapidating signs using
a new urban blight ordinance. Passed last year, the ordinance requires
business owners to keep their commercial signs in good condition, or repay
the city for the work of restoring them.
Chavez took exception to being included among the dozen examples without
being notified first. At the next council meeting, he accused the city
of failing to maintain some of its own facilities, and got into a short
shouting match with Councilman Pat Butler.
Since then, the city has sent out its first wave of letters to 34 businesses,
mostly along Highway 66 impressing on the owners the advantages of fixing
their signs on their own.
Among the businesses on the list was Virgie's.
Chavez said he's received his letter, and has already started working
on his sign, which only started chipping after the latest winter weather.
Chavez didn't mind the jokes, he said, "because everyone who knows
me knew I was going to do something about my sign."
He doesn't mind fixing the sign, he said, which could cost between $200
and $2,000 depending on whether he'll need to rent a sky jack to finish
the work. He'll also have to fix the neon lights now, which the wobbly
scaffolding used for the paint job knocked out.
What he did mind was being made an example of.
"It's embarrassing when they use you as an example and they don't
tell you about it," he said. "It's the power of embarrassment;
that's what I call it."
Councilors insisted they had no intention of embarrassing Chavez or singling
him out.
The whole point of the initiative, said the man behind the plan, City
Manager Eric Honeyfield, is to help the business community. Dilapidating
signs, he argues, give the impression of a dying community, a community
where entrepreneurs and tourists won't want to come to spend their money.
The letter takes a soft approach with the business owners, encouraging
them to see things the city's way.
"The compliance of freestanding signage is essential to further the
efforts of a positive public image that not only enhances favorable impressions
on visitors, but also enriches the community quality of life for those
living here," it reads.
"The new ordinance pertaining to improvement, preservation and enhancement
of the City of Gallup is not intended to deprive the affected property
owners of their beneficial use of their property, but rather to minimize
negative public image and implement measures to protect the (health),
safety and welfare of the owners and residents within and adjacent to
unmaintained signs."
Although each letter went out with a complete copy of the new ordinance,
it doesn't mention that the city can put a lien on the business, do the
work itself, and present the owner with a bill.
Honeyfield said he hoped to win the owners over without emphasizing that
option.
City Planner Lisa Baca Diaz, in charge of getting the letters out, said
she's heard of no complaints from the owners she's spoken with, or any
reports of complaints from her staff.
Honeyfield said he's only heard from Chavez so far.
"I'm still not happy," Chavez said, "but I'm going to get
my sign done."
And he's still upset with the city for leaning on the business community
when city facilities are still out of compliance with local landscape
standards.
"If they want businesses to get their stuff done, they ought to lead
by example," he said.
Honeyfield has acknowledged the city's lapses here and there and said
that crews are on the job.
According to Baca Diaz, these 34 letters were just the first batch. She
said city staff will begin surveying the signs along Gallup's other main
thoroughfares soon.
|
Monday
June 6, 2005
Selected Stories:
City sends out letters about
aging signs
So the world will know; Memorial honors
'Long Walk'
Appreciation Day: One of the best
Marriage Act veto disappoints some
Deaths
|